Top 10 Mistakes Indian Startups Make While Raising Funds
Raising funds is one of the toughest milestones for Indian Start Ups — and also where many falter. From chasing the wrong investors to messy cap tables and unrealistic valuations, common mistakes can stall or even sink promising ventures. This article breaks down the *Top 10 Mistakes Indian Startups Make While Raising Funds* and offers practical fixes every founder should know before stepping into the investor room.
9/2/20255 min read
Top 10 Mistakes Indian Startups Make While Raising Funds
1) Chasing the wrong investors
The mistake: Email-blasting every fund, courting late-stage or crypto-only funds for a SaaS seed, ignoring partner theses, cheque sizes, or India focus.
Why it hurts: Wastes months, demoralizes teams, and burns reputational capital.
Fix: Build a laser-targeted list: stage fit, sector fit, India allocation, average cheque size, follow-on behavior, and partner who actually leads deals. Warm paths via founders/angels > cold emails.
Quick checklist
Stage: pre-seed/seed/Series A?
Sector: do they have 2–3 portfolio bets like you (signals appetite)?
Geography: active in India last 12–18 months?
Cheque size & ownership targets align with your round?
2) Pitching a product tour instead of a capital story
The mistake: Demoing features and UI without a capital-efficient path from ₹1 today → ₹10 revenue in 18–24 months.
Why it hurts: Investors fund growth engines, not roadmaps.
Fix: Anchor on a sharp narrative: Pain → Unique wedge → Repeatable distribution → Unit economics → Milestone plan for this round. End every section with “what funding unlocks.”
Make it concrete
“This ₹6 Cr will take us from 1,000 to 12,000 paying SMEs by doubling partner-led distribution and launching self-serve onboarding; ARR from ₹1.2 Cr → ₹9–10 Cr; payback holds at <9 months.”
3) Raising with weak or vanity metrics
The mistake: Leading with app installs, waitlists, impressions; hiding retention, gross margin, payback, cohort curves.
Why it hurts: Experienced investors filter in seconds.
Fix: Show evidence of repeatability: acquisition → activation → retention → revenue. For pre-revenue, show LOIs/pilots, conversion rates, and unit-economic experiments.
Core metrics to show
B2C: D1/D7/D30 retention, CAC, payback, contribution margin, cohort LTV.
B2B: Pipeline by stage, win rate, sales cycle, ACV, net revenue retention (NRR).
Commerce: CM1/CM2, return rate, logistics cost as % GMV, repeat purchase rate.
4) Fuzzy unit economics and sloppy financials
The mistake: Not separating variable vs. fixed costs, ignoring returns/logistics, underestimating support or compliance costs.
Why it hurts: If the model breaks at scale, the deal dies.
Fix: Start from first principles. Build a clear unit-level P&L and a bottom-up operating plan tied to headcount and channel budgets. Show scenarios (base / upside / downside) and cash runway by month.
Must-have
Cohort LTV vs. fully-loaded CAC
Payback (months) and contribution margin by channel
Hiring plan mapped to milestones, not titles
5) Unrealistic valuation and dilution math
The mistake: Anchoring on Twitter rounds or peak-cycle comps; insisting on a number that makes downstream rounds impossible.
Why it hurts: Misaligned expectations = slow/no round; over-valuation → down-round risk.
Fix: Price for momentum and follow-on success. Work backwards from round size, ownership norms, and milestone risk.
Rule-of-thumb
Pre-seed/seed: sell ~15–20% (total including notes/SAFEs).
Series A: plan to show metrics that justify 25–35% step-up ownership for the new lead.
Model dilution across 3 rounds so founders still own ≥40–50% post-A.
6) Cap table chaos and unclear ESOPs
The mistake: Too many early micro-cheques, missing founder vesting, verbal ESOP promises, unpriced notes without caps.
Why it hurts: Spooks leads; kills room for future rounds.
Fix: Clean up before you fundraise. Consolidate very small holders, formalize founder vesting with cliffs, create a real ESOP pool (8–15%) with a policy and grant letters.
Cap table hygiene
One canonical cap table file, consistent across MCA filings and investor docs
All notes/SAFEs: written, with cap/discount, MFN clarified
ESOP: pool created, board consent, grant templates ready
7) Poor diligence readiness (India compliance edition)
The mistake: Treating diligence as an afterthought. Missing ROC filings, GST/TDS issues, IP assignment, vendor contracts, or payroll compliances.
Why it hurts: Deals stall or re-price when red flags emerge.
Fix: Assemble a clean data room and pre-diligence checklist.
India-specific items investors expect
Certificate of Incorporation, MOA/AOA; Board and shareholder resolutions
Updated cap table; SHA/SSA, ESOP plan & grants
Statutory: GST returns, ITRs, PF/ESI (if applicable), key licenses, major contracts (customers, vendors, leases), privacy/terms
IP: assignment from founders/contractors, trademarks, source-code ownership
If you’ve raised from abroad: bank FIRC, share allotment records
8) Data room mess and version confusion
The mistake: Sending docs piecemeal over WhatsApp/email; multiple versions; missing model logic.
Why it hurts: Slows trust and cycles.
Fix: One structured data room with read-only, versioned folders. Include a Read Me that explains the model, the round, and key assumptions.
Minimum viable data room
Narrative: 10–12 slide deck + 1-pager
Metrics: last 12–18 months monthly metrics; cohort views
Financial model: clearly labeled inputs, linked statements, hiring plan
Legal & Compliance: as above
References: 3–5 customer references ready to speak
9) Single-threaded, last-minute process
The mistake: Pitching sequentially, taking each “maybe” as a “yes,” and running out of runway.
Why it hurts: Weak leverage, slow close, suboptimal terms.
Fix: Run a tight, time-boxed process with parallel conversations and weekly momentum updates.
Process discipline
2–3 week outreach → 2–3 week deep dives → 1 week term-sheet window
Maintain a pipeline tracker: stage, owner, next action, blockers
Always know who needs what to say yes and by when
Raise with ≥6 months runway; never below 3 months
10) Mishandling term sheets and post-TS execution
The mistake: Fixating on valuation while ignoring liquidation prefs, anti-dilution, pro-rata, vetoes, ESOP top-ups, or overly broad protective provisions. Then, after signing, letting closing tasks drift.
Why it hurts: Hidden economics and control issues; closing delays = deal risk.
Fix: Compare total economics (valuation × terms). Use a standard counsel experienced in venture deals. Create a closing checklist on Day 1 of TS.
Term sanity
1x non-participating liquidation preference is normal; participating or >1x is costly
Narrow reserved matters; reasonable information rights
Clear timelines: diligence owners, CPs (conditions precedent), funds flow, filings
How to Prepare Before You Start the Round (2-Week Sprint)
Day 1–2: Story & Numbers
Tight 10–12 slide deck; 1-pager with crisp ask and uses of funds
Unit-economics model validated on recent cohorts; 12–18 month operating plan
Day 3–4: Cap Table & Legal
Clean cap table, founder vesting, ESOP pool and drafts
Compile key corporate, tax, payroll, and IP documents
Day 5–6: Data Room
Create folder structure; upload docs; add Read Me; verify permissions
Prepare 3 customer references and 2 founder references
Day 7–10: Target List & Warm Intros
30–40 investors bucketed by fit; map warm paths; pre-book 10–15 meetings
Day 11–14: Dry Runs & FAQ
Mock pitches; objection handling (valuation, competition, defensibility, TAM)
Draft email templates for updates and process control
Common Red Flags (and Scripts)
“We’ll become profitable once we scale.”
Better: “At 10k monthly orders, contribution margin hits 18% with logistics efficiencies; we reach CM-positive in Q2 and company-level break-even at ₹1.2 Cr MRR.”“No competition.”
Better: “Incumbents A/B serve enterprise; we win SMBs with a 10-minute setup and integrations with Tally/WhatsApp—70% faster time-to-value.”“We just need cash for marketing.”
Better: “This round funds three growth levers we’ve already validated: partner-led (CAC ₹1,800, 6-month payback), performance (₹2,400, 8-month), and founder-led enterprise pilots (₹0 CAC, 90-day cycle).”
A Simple Fundraising Quality Bar (FQB)
Ship when you can honestly tick these:
Deck tells a capital story in 12 slides or fewer.
Unit economics clear; payback under control; retention visible.
Clean cap table; ESOP pool; founder vesting.
Diligence-ready data room.
30–40 investor list with mapped warm intros.
Runway ≥6 months and a time-boxed process plan.
Term sheet comprehension beyond valuation.
Prepared references and customer proof.
A precise ask (“₹6 Cr for 18 months runway to hit ₹10 Cr ARR”).
Weekly investor update template ready.
Bottom Line
Great rounds aren’t about more meetings; they’re about less friction: a targeted investor list, a narrative tied to unit economics, clean governance, and a disciplined process. Get these right, and the odds tilt sharply in your favour—no matter the market cycle.
Accelerate
Empowering startups to launch and scale effectively.
Innovate
Connect
info@ibxindia.com
9010 400 355
© 2025. All rights reserved ibxindia.com